Wednesday, November 4th, 2009
Time Warner posts lower 3Q profit, confirms magazine job cuts but boosts earnings outlook
NEW YORK - Media conglomerate Time Warner Inc. reported a 38 per cent drop in third-quarter profit, hurt by declines at its AOL and publishing segments.
Even so, the results beat expectations and the company boosted its full-year earnings forecast. And Time Warner said it is still on track to spin off AOL.
Shares rose 61 cents, or two per cent, to $30.77 in morning trading Wednesday.
The company confirmed that it will cut jobs at its magazine unit, Time Inc., though it would not offer details on the extent or timing of the cutbacks. It expects to take about $100 million in restructuring charges this quarter.
On a conference call with analysts, the company said it will make most of the cuts at Time Inc.'s news group, which includes Time magazine, Sports Illustrated, Fortune and Money.
Time Warner, which also owns the Warner Bros. movie studio and the HBO and Turner cable networks, said Wednesday its profit fell to $661 million, or 55 cents per share, in the July-September quarter, down from $1.1 billion, or 89 cents per share, a year ago.
Excluding unusual items, earnings came to 61 cents a share. That tops the analysts' average forecast of 53 cents, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters.
Last year's earnings included results from Time Warner's spun-off cable unit, Time Warner Cable Inc. Earnings from continuing operations fell a more modest 14 per cent.
Revenue fell six per cent to $7.1 billion, in line with analysts' estimates.
The company expects adjusted earnings of at least $2.05 per share for the year, up from its earlier forecast of $1.98. Analysts had been forecasting $2.02 a share.
The AOL unit saw a 23 per cent drop in revenue in the latest quarter. AOL ended the quarter with 5.4 million dial-up subscribers, down 438,000 from the quarter before.
Revenue at Time Warner's publishing operations dropped 18 per cent as advertising sales continued to suffer.
Time Warner's movie studio and cable channels, which rely less on ad dollars, fared better.

